Skip to content

Hybrid Intention in Criminal Law: Rethinking Culpability in Posthuman Contexts

Janko Munjić · Jusletter IT · 25 June 2026

Abstract

This paper proposes a doctrinal framework for attributing criminal responsibility in human-AI systems through the concept of hybrid intention. Hybrid intention arises where a human initiates a purposive course of conduct, its realisation is constitutively mediated by an artificial system, and a limited but assessable control window remains available to the human agent. From this structure follows a three-part attribution test focusing on initiation, technological mediation and control. The test is illustrated through a surgical AI scenario and offers court-usable criteria that preserve anthropocentric culpability in posthuman contexts.

Bibliographic record

Author
Janko Munjić
Journal
Jusletter IT
Issue
juni-2026
Published
25 June 2026
Publisher
Weblaw
ISSN
1664-848X
Language
EN
Full text
Version of record at the publisher (subscription)

Versions of this work

One intellectual work, recorded once. The entries below are different appearances of it, not separate publications.

Keywords

hybrid intentioncriminal lawhuman-AI systemsaugmented agencycriminal culpabilityAI-mediated actioninitiationmediationcontrolcontrol window

Research themes

  • Criminal Responsibility and AI

    How should criminal law attribute culpability when human decisions are mediated by autonomous systems, predictive tools or intelligent interfaces?

  • Hybrid Agency and Augmented Action

    What happens to intention, control and accountability when human action is extended through robotic systems, neuroprosthetics or human-machine environments?

Cite this work

Munjić, J. (2026). Hybrid Intention in Criminal Law: Rethinking Culpability in Posthuman Contexts. Jusletter IT, juni-2026. https://doi.org/10.38023/da669e69-2730-4c2b-abab-a391164afb83