Skip to content

Rethinking Human Rights Protection in the Age of AI: From Ex-Post Remedies to Rights-by-Design

Janko Munjić · Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics · 3 May 2026

Abstract

As artificial intelligence rapidly becomes a mediating but often invisible factor in decision-making across many areas that are central to the realisation of human rights, ranging from social welfare to the judiciary, legal protection still predominantly operates through an ex-post logic, reacting only after harm has occurred. This article identifies the functional defects of that model in contemporary algorithmic systems, where decision-making opacity, automation, and fragmented responsibility complicate the identification of the responsible actor, proof of causation, and the effective contestation of outcomes.

Bibliographic record

Author
Janko Munjić
Journal
Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
23–36
Published
3 May 2026
Publisher
University of Niš
ISSN
2406-1786, 1450-5517
Language
EN
Full text
Open access

Cited in verified scholarly literature

Cited, pending verification against the original

An indexing platform displays the citing work’s own reference to this article. The original document has not yet been obtained, so this citation is recorded separately from the verified record above.

Keywords

artificial intelligencehuman rightsrights-by-designEU AI Actfundamental rightsfundamental-rights impact assessmentex-post remediespreventive safeguards

Research themes

Cite this work

Munjić, J. (2026). Rethinking Human Rights Protection in the Age of AI: From Ex-Post Remedies to Rights-by-Design. Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics, 24(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP251226003M