Rethinking Human Rights Protection in the Age of AI: From Ex-Post Remedies to Rights-by-Design
Janko Munjić · Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics · 3 May 2026
Abstract
As artificial intelligence rapidly becomes a mediating but often invisible factor in decision-making across many areas that are central to the realisation of human rights, ranging from social welfare to the judiciary, legal protection still predominantly operates through an ex-post logic, reacting only after harm has occurred. This article identifies the functional defects of that model in contemporary algorithmic systems, where decision-making opacity, automation, and fragmented responsibility complicate the identification of the responsible actor, proof of causation, and the effective contestation of outcomes.
Bibliographic record
- Author
- Janko Munjić
- Journal
- Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23–36
- Published
- 3 May 2026
- Publisher
- University of Niš
- ISSN
- 2406-1786, 1450-5517
- Language
- EN
- Full text
- Open access
Keywords
Research themes
- Human Rights and Procedural Safeguards
Under what procedural and human-rights conditions can technological evidence and AI-enabled tools be used in criminal justice?
- AI-Enabled Judicial Cooperation
How should judicial institutions prepare for AI-enabled cooperation while protecting legality, fairness and human rights?
Related publications
- From Admissibility to Contestability: Structural Opacity, Encrypted-Platform Evidence, and the Limits of Adversarial Review
Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 64(1), 2026
Cite this work
Munjić, J. (2026). Rethinking Human Rights Protection in the Age of AI: From Ex-Post Remedies to Rights-by-Design. Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics, 24(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP251226003M